While preparing a CDR report for Engineers Australia skills assessment, many migrants have several misconceptions that lead to improper CDR report submission and a negative CDR assessment. The information they read through different sources, not all convey the correct and authentic information. Misconceptions generally undermine the report’s effectiveness and its results. Thus, it is necessary to understand and avoid these while writing a CDR report for Engineers Australia (Assessing Body). However, skilled migrants do not need to worry, as this guide will help them learn what is right and what is wrong about competency demonstration report (CDR) preparation and clear several misunderstandings.
Read Related Blog ⇒ What Happens If CDR Gets Rejected?
CDRAustralia.Org is a technical competency report writing support provider for Engineers, prominently known for its comprehensive, premium, and trusted CDR assistance. With a resolute commitment to excellence, the platform’s professional writers offer customised help tailored to individual needs. With their expertise and experience, they understand how to craft an engaging report that meets all the guidelines and impresses the assessor for a successful assessment. From proper documentation to effectively structured narratives, they ensure every aspect of an assessment report is finely tuned to perfection. Their comprehensive approach, coupled with extensive industry knowledge, sets them apart as a premier choice for CDR assistance.
Here You Will Get To Know 10 Misunderstanding About CDR Reports For Australian Skilled Migration
1.) The CDR And A CV Is Similar
Fact: A curriculum vitae (CV) is an account of an applicant’s education and work history. At the same time, a CDR is a comprehensive narrative across three career episodes that demonstrate how they applied their engineering knowledge and competence in specific situations to meet Australian standards.
2.) Only Technical Skills Need To Be Demonstrated
Fact: It is misleading that a CDR is all about demonstrating technical skills. Well, it is crucial to demonstrate technical skills, but the report must also demonstrate other competencies, including problem-solving, decision-making, communication, and teamwork.
3.) A Longer CDR With Higher Word Counts Is of Better Quality
Fact: A CDR with higher word counts does not mean it is of better quality. The quality of the information matters more than the word count. The assessor, Engineers Australia, has specified word limits for each career episode (1000 to 2500 words), and exceeding these limits for any reason can result in rejection.
4.) Any English Language, Spelling, And Grammar Is Acceptable
Fact: A CDR report must follow Australian standard English. Spelling mistakes, poor grammar, and illogical phrasing can reflect poorly on applicants’ communication skills and professionalism, which are key competencies to be assessed.
5.) Exaggerated Achievements Will Impress The Assessor
Fact: Providing exaggerated and incorrect information is breaching the code of ethical conduct. As it is a serious offence, it may result in rejection and a potential ban for reapplying for up to 3 years. A CDR requires correct and verified information.
6.) Copying From Online Sources Is Acceptable
Fact: Copying or plagiarism is one of the reasons for rejection. Engineers Australia uses plagiarism-checking software to detect copied content from online samples, reports, and other sources. Samples may be used for reference purposes only.
7.) Writing in “We” Instead of “I” Statement
Fact: The assessment is generally intended to assess an individual’s knowledge and skills, not teamwork. Hence, applicants must write in an “I” statement (such as “I designed”, “I resolved”, “I obtained”) to clearly outline their personal contribution, achievements, and role within the project.
8.) Only Major And Large-Scale Projects Are Required
Fact: The size of the project is less important than demonstrating the competency elements. It is crucial how well an applicant demonstrates their competency elements. Moreover, smaller projects allow more hands-on involvement and a cleared narrative of their personal engineering applications.
9.) One Project Can Be Split Into Multiple Career Episodes
Fact: Each career episode’s narrative must represent a distinct period or aspect of engineering activity or career progression to display the breadth and depth of their adaptability and experience.
10.) A Summary Statement Is Less Valuable And A Minor Section
Fact: A summary statement is a key section that cross-references the specific competency element with the particular paragraph number in career episodes. An incorrect summary statement makes it difficult for the assessor to assess an applicant’s competence and may lead to rejection.
Read Related Blog ⇒ Steps Need To Prepare CDR For Australia Migration