There can be several reasons for Engineers Australia’s negative skill assessment. Some of the most common reasons include plagiarised information, insufficient relevant documentation, improper or inadequate demonstration of engineering applications, and misappropriation of qualification or experience for the nominated occupation. These are the general causes of negative skill evaluations or CDR rejections. The assessor, Engineers Australia (EA), normally requires engineers to produce valid and complete documents and information for the migration skills assessment. If the assessor finds any misinformation or misappropriation, it will result in a negative skills assessment.
Well, we at CDRAustralia.org help candidates avoid negative skill assessments or recover from them by providing exceptional CDR writing support. As a leader in CDR writing, we boast a track record of helping countless engineers realise their Australian migration dreams. Our extensive approach, coupled with extreme industry knowledge, sets us apart as one of the premier choices for CDR assistance. From meticulous documentation to expertly crafted narratives, our professionals ensure that every aspect of the CDR application is finely tuned to perfection. Get our technical writing service right now to avoid negative assessment outcomes and ensure success.
Seven Reasons For Engineers Australia Negative Skills Assessment
- Missing or Irrelevant Documentation: Candidates sometimes fail to provide relevant documents, such as English language test results, academic transcripts, and employment reference letters, which can affect the assessment process and result in rejection.
- Inappropriate Pathway Selection: Selecting the wrong skills assessment pathway —for example, applying through the CDR assessment pathway when the qualification accreditation pathway was more appropriate.
- Insufficient Qualification and Work Experience: Submitting the qualification and work experience evidence that do not match the nominated occupational category or are not relevant to the ANZSCO code.
- Copying or Plagiarism: Copying or pasting information from online samples or other sources is a serious offence or major violation of the Australian code of ethical conduct. Such misconduct by applicants often results in an immediate ban of up to 36 months.
- Insufficient Demonstration of Competencies: If applicants fail to demonstrate their personal engineering abilities, such as problem-solving and leadership skills, it results in a negative skills evaluation. Additionally, if their information is generic and focuses on team achievements rather than individual contribution or non-engineering duties, it may give a bad impression and result in application rejection.
- Poorly Crafted CDR: A report that has spelling and grammatical mistakes, is not coherently written, includes excessive technical jargon without context, does not follow word count guidelines, or fails to follow the specific structure outlined in the MSA booklet often yields negative assessment outcomes.
- Failure to Follow the Guidelines: Not complying with Engineers Australia’s assessment guidelines outlined in the MSA booklet always results in a CDR rejection.
Conclusion: If candidates want to overcome negative assessment or avoid CDR rejection, they must strictly follow the guidelines and procedures outlined in the EA’s migration skills assessment (MSA) booklet. Moreover, if they have any doubts related to CDR writing, they can seek our professional writing support to ace their migration skills assessment.
If you got Engineers Australia Assessment Outcome Letter today and asking original project report or your outcomes is Unsuccessful? No worries!! We handle this case. We prepare original project report for all engineering streams.
Once the Candidate had completed the Skill assessment process, then Engineers Australia will send an Assessment Outcome Letter, which is a specific letter for migrating to Australia. This Outcome Letter will be sent to you through email, or else it will be sent through your migration agent if you had assigned anyone, they will follow up on your behalf too. If there is any problem in sending through electronically, then they will send it through postal. This ordinary post addresses will be chargeable in cases. This letter can also be downloaded from online by entering the application details on the Assessment Outcome Verification page.
Submit Three Original Project Report to Get it approved Again
The letter is to deliver that the candidates CDR report is selected or rejected by Engineer Australia. This outcome letter contains the statement from the assessor that your Skills, experience, etc. all data are verified, and it satisfies the current requirement for the applied detailed occupation. There is a test called GSM (General Skilled Migration) points test. These are some of the necessary information which will be mentioned in the outcome letter. There is an additional service which will denote the employment. Relevant Skilled Employment is the service which has to be paid separately for assessments; with this, there will be a reflection about the occupation in the outcome letter. This will be the added points to the verification team to verify for the relevant rule.
Is 12 Month Banned Imposed on You?
All the points and advice reflected in the Engineers Australia Assessment Outcome Letter is purely based on the assessment points, evidence, data, skills submitted. They also consider the aspects with the skilled migration points test, even the Department of Immigration and Border Protection assessment points. There may be any assessment results if you are not satisfied or any disagreement with the outcome result, you can apply as formal Appeal an informal review of your application. Relevant charges are applicable, and you can get the information from the EA website. An Informal Review has to be applied within three months of receiving a letter; it will take eight weeks for review. Formal Appeal has to be made within six months or receiving original assessment outcome and it will take three months to process.